Ziff Blog
Do you have questions about NY injury law? If so, you have come to the right place! Here we will address the common questions our clients have been asking for many years. Welcome aboard! If you have a question not answered here, feel free to post your question here and we will be happy to respond.



$20,000,000+ Settlement Against Corning Hospital!

Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Tragically, just 40 minutes can make the difference between a healthy baby and a little girl who will never walk, never talk, never feed herself, never have a boyfriend, never get married…

In this case handled by Elmira medical malpractice attorney Jim Reed, the Labor and Delivery nurses hooked the Mom up to an electronic fetal monitor and then left the Mom unattended for 40+ minutes. Unfortunately, fetal monitors are absolutely no good if no one is there to read the results….

That’s why the standard of care for labor and delivery nurses requires nurses to review the monitor strips for the first 20 minutes that the mother is placed on the monitor. If all is OK after 20 minutes, the Mom can then be left unattended for short periods of time. If the strips are not OK, then the nurse is trained to immediately intervene and summon a doctor if necessary.

In this case, a careful review of the medical records revealed that the mother had been left totally unattended for the first 40+ minutes she was placed on the fetal monitor. As you might have guessed, the monitor strips were bad meaning that the baby was in trouble and needed immediate delivery. The problem is that no one was in the room to hear read the results and respond to the baby’s cries for help. As a result, the necessary C-section to rescue the baby was delayed by more than an hour causing the baby to suffer profound brain damage (Cerebral Palsy). The baby was rushed from the Corning Hospital to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Arnot Ogden Medical Center in Elmira, but the damage was already done. The baby had a permanent brain injury called Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) which means that the baby’s brain was deprived of oxygen at birth. Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Safety Tip #1 — Check your Tires

Auto Accidents, Choosing a Lawyer, Humor, Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Auto Insurance, NY Courts, Practice TipsNo Comments

“A stitch in time saves nine.” I never really understood this proverb when I was growing up, though I certainly heard my father use it on more than one occasion as he cautioned me to take my time before embarking on a new endeavor.

As a personal injury attorney in the Elmira/Corning, New York area, I have now come to understand the true wisdom behind those words, especially when it comes to automobile maintenance. Accidents certainly do happen, but general awareness of basic automobile maintenance can go a long way toward preventing personal injuries and saving lives. Although I do not profess to be an expert mechanic in any way, I have decided to post basic auto tips periodically this summer to inform – or more likely, remind – readers of simple steps you can take to protect your families from injuries sustained in automobile accidents.To many people summer is synonymous with road trips and family vacation, and I hope my tips will help readers stay safe when hitting the roads.

Tip #1 – Check your Tires

Today is my parents’ 40th wedding anniversary. My father, ever the romantic, decided to take my mother to the Sherwood Inn in Skaneateles, New York for a little getaway. Alas, as my parents pulled out of Horseheads to begin their journey, they got a flat tire. Luckily neither was injured and my dad had the tools to change the tire, though they may have been “spared” (I couldn’t resist) a short delay if only my dad had followed his own advice and checked car before getting on the road.

Tires are crucial to vehicle’s handling, traction, and stability, and can cause an automobile to loose alignment if they are not in proper working order. In general, you should check each of tire periodically, or about once a month.

When checking your tires, first look for obvious defects and damage, and visit a professional if anything looks seriously amiss.

It is very wise to carry a tire gauge in your automobile at all times, and you should check the pressure in each of your tires every time you check them. Tire pressure changes due to a variety of factors, though they are most commonly affected by changes in weather or air temperature. A decrease in air temperature often causes a loss in tire pressure, while an increase in air temperature often causes a gain.

Each vehicle has its own recommended air pressure, and information about it can likely be found in your vehicle’s owners manual. Although a tire’s maximum pressure is listed on its in fine print, you should never use max pressure as a guide when filling your tires because over-inflation allows tires to puncture more easily and can create instability for your automobile.

As an avid bicycle rider, I realize the importance of checking the pressure of my bike’s tires before every ride I take to avoid an accident (and make the ride more enjoyable!) Although checking a vehicle’s tires before every trip may be a bit overly onerous, it is something all of us could do a bit more frequently in order to stay safe.

Thanks for reading,

Christina Bruner Sonsire

Share on Facebook

District of Columbia, et. al. v. Heller: One for the Ages

Attorney Ethics, Choosing a Lawyer, Lawsuits, Miscellaneous, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and Cases3 Comments

Calling all Constitutional Law Junkies: June 26, 2008 was a monumental day.

It is not often (yet more frequent these days than is perhaps appropriate) that the U.S. Supreme Court authors a decision in which it offers — in nearly 150 pages of disparate, arguably subjective detail — overtly telepathic insight into the minds and hearts of the framers cast under a thin, unimpressive veil of stare decisis. A day to celebrate? Perhaps, as it was for the N.R.A. supporters and the libertarian crowd who view the District of Columbia, et. al. v. Heller through a narrow pragmatic lense as a promotion of individual liberties (and security that they can keep their guns.) A day for outrage? Apparently for a “frightened” Mayor Daley, as he trumpeted the call to fight for the right to ban guns in his hometown and plans were made to challenge similar laws in megapolises across the country.

I felt something in between. I feel scholastic excitement, to be sure. Heller , like Bush v. Gore, will certainly endure as a landmark case in Constitutional Law 101 for centuries to come. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia and joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy, is bursting with interesting (if somewhat trivial given Scalia’s general predisposition against extra-four corners constitutional analysis) historical references — James Madison’s inclusion of a conscientious-objector clause in his original draft of the Second Amendment; E. de Vattel’s 1792 “The Law of Nations, or, Principals of the Law of Nature”; England’s 1671 “Game Act”; and, of course, the mighty and ever-persuasive Federalist Papers. (As a reverent admirer of the Papers, Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

HIPAA – ANOTHER CASE OF POWERFUL RIGHTS AND WIMPY REMEDIES

Auto Accidents, Health Insurance, Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and Cases, Practice TipsNo Comments

 

 

In a world seemingly dominated by all-encompassing HIPAA protections (i.e. the dozens of forms you are asked to sign when treated in the hospital) and daunting HIPAA fears (i.e. your boss’s warning that you cannot repeat, recite nor should you even remember information you learn from HIPAA sensitive documents while on the job,) the question inevitably arises: What can I do if I feel my so-called “HIPAA rights” are violated?

 

Proper analysis of that inquiry requires a basic understanding of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.  (A complete copy of the HIPAA statute can be found at http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm.)   Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Personal Injury Case

Auto Accidents, Lawsuits, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, Practice Tips4 Comments

Alternative dispute resolution (or ADR for short) is being increasingly pushed by the judiciary and insurance companies involved in civil litigation.  The Federal courts even have pilot programs where ADR is mandated before a case can proceed to trial.  The question for the personal injury attorney and client is whether ADR is a good thing.

There are three different methods of ADR presently in use in New York.  They are mediation, arbitration and summary jury trials.  Mediation and arbitration are by far the two most common, but summary jury trials are also increasing in frequency.  Mediation is a process by which all parties agree to meet with a mediator.  The mediator does not have authority to determine any issues, but merely tries to foster agreement among the parties and broker a settlement.  The mediator has no interest in the outcome of the case, and acts as a neutral third party who looks at the potential evidence with the clear eye of someone not personally involved in the litigation.  A skilled mediator can help each side to see their potential problem areas, and arrive at a reasonable settlement figure in light of the strengths and weaknesses of their case.  If at the end of the mediation no agreement is reached, the case proceeds to trial.

Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Who let the (vicious) dogs out?

Keeping Your Family Safe, Lawsuits, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

ziffchristinabrunermarch08_005.jpg

It’s that time of year again.  The days are getting longer, the weather is getting warmer and the runners and cyclists are getting restless-er.  However, a word to all wise dog owners – make sure your pet does not follow suit and, following a lazy winter of prolonged naps and indoor play, become caught up in the spring fever and use all of his pent up energy to harass – or worse, injure – an innocent passer-by.

New York law imposes a high standard on dog owners, particularly owners of dogs that have ever shown “vicious propensities,” (legalese for prior displays of mean, unruly and aggressive behavior.)  As a dedicated marathoner, I must say I am glad the law seeks to hold pet owners responsible for misdeeds, yet as a former and likely future dog owner, I recognize the necessity for understanding the basics of New York’s dog owner liability doctrine to avoid legal entanglements.

In brief, under New York law a dog owner is potentially liable for injuries his dog causes to another person if Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

A New NY Case Destroys Accident Victims Privacy Rights

Medical Malpractice, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Even though a large percentage of my practice is devoted to NY and PA medical malpractice cases, I have tremendous respect for the medical profession.  In fact, three of my college roommates and one of my best friends now are doctors.  I know most doctors are intelligent, compassionate and dedicated to good patient care.  Of course, like every profession, there are bad apples in the medical field who give a bad name to all the good doctors out there. 

But whether good doctor or bad doctor, an almost universal truth in the medical profession is that doctors dislike lawyers.  I think the reasons for this are many– some legitimate and some not– but that will have to be a subject for another post.   This post is devoted to a recent NY case that I think is HORRIBLE LAW and that I KNOW is going to create further friction between doctors and lawyers.  There is no doubt in my mind that this case will result in great abuse by insurance companies and their defense lawyers….

Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

New York’s Court Of Claims, A Court Like No Other!

Lawsuits, NY Courts2 Comments

What do you think of when someone says “trial”? A brief and unofficial survey of some non-lawyer friends resulted in the word “jury” cropping up just over 80% of the time. A trial by jury is one of the most time honored traditions of our system of jurisprudence. Our right to a trial by a jury of our peers before our liberty or property can be taken from us is a cornerstone of our constitution, born out of secret tribunals in England’s medieval times, where courts established by and for the ruling class were used to keep the masses in their place. Trials by a jury are meant to be the great equalizer, to ensure that everyone, no matter their place in society, can obtain a fair and impartial verdict. So why is it, then, that we lose this indelible constitutional right when we sue the State of New York?

Under New York State law, any claim against the State of New York can only be brought in a special court called the Court of Claims. The Court of Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction, which only presides over cases against the State. In order to preserve your right to sue, a Notice of Intent to make a claim must be filed with the Court of Claims within 90 days of the act or occurence which forms the basis of the claim. Failure to timely file this Notice of Intent likely means that you will forever be barred from bringing your claim, even though many people may not realize they had a claim to bring until well after the 90 days has passed. There are circumtances where a Notice of Intent can be filed late, however, so prompt consultation with an attorney experienced in bringing claims against the State is HIGHLY recommended.

The biggest difference between the Court of Claims and traditional courts, however, is that there is no right to a jury trial in the Court of Claims. It isn’t even an option. Instead, trials are conducted before a judge appointed by the State (yes the same State that is the defendant in the case) and defended by the Attorney General’s Office. The Judge presides over the discovery process, determines motions that will limit the admissable evidence at trial, and then serves as the finder of fact at trial, where they are expected to disregard the knowledge of the case they have acquired over the preceding years, and base their verdict solely on the admissable evidence. In a strange twist, the judge who presides over the trial doesn’t have the last say on the verdict. Once the trial judge writes a proposed decision, that decision is submitted to a secret panel that reviews the evidence and testimony and approves the final version of the decision. That process takes place in secret, without the right of the Claimant’s attorney to argue the evidence or be heard.

So how can this happen? That is a very good question with a very convoluted answer. In general, the states and the federal government enjoy what is called Sovereign Immunity. Sovereign Immunity is founded upon the ancient principle that “the King can do no wrong”. In the present day, this principle bars holding the government or its political subdivisions liable for the torts of its officers or agents unless immunity is waived. The federal government has waived its immunity, and permits suits against it pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. New York, as well as most every other state, has also waived their Soveregn Immunity to one extent or another.

Since every state is free to determine how and to what extent they will waive their immunity, we are left with the Court of Claims in New York. While it may be little more than a modern day Star Chamber, it is the only way to even attempt to hold the State of New York liable for its actions.

Thanks for reading,

Adam M. Gee, Esq.

Share on Facebook

Judge Rips Attorney for Improper and Unethical Conduct

Attorney Ethics, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Many people feel that attorneys behaving badly is “par for the course” but we are fortunate to live in Upstate New York where the vast majority of the attorneys in the  legal community are hard-working, reasonable and ethical.  That’s not to say there aren’t some bad apples that make a bad name for everyone, but thankfully those attorneys are the exception rather than the rule.  Downstate New York is a different story and most of the reported decisions regarding attorney misconduct come from Downstate (for us Upstate New York folks, “downstate” is anywhere South of the Roscoe Diner!  :-)   A recent downstate case (New York County Supreme Court illustrates my point….. Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

The “People’s Court”– NY Small Claims Court

Lawsuits, NY Courts1 Comment

Do you have a dispute with a local merchant, a neighbor, someone who did you wrong?  If so, you might be able to easily handle the dispute on your own without having to hire a lawyer!  Below are the nuts and bolts for handling a Small Claims Court matter in New York.  Since my office is in Elmira, I will use the Small Claims Court information in Elmira as my example but I will also provide information for other courts throughout the State of New York.

Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

« Previous Entries