Ziff Blog
Do you have questions about NY injury law? If so, you have come to the right place! Here we will address the common questions our clients have been asking for many years. Welcome aboard! If you have a question not answered here, feel free to post your question here and we will be happy to respond.



$20,000,000+ Settlement Against Corning Hospital!

Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Tragically, just 40 minutes can make the difference between a healthy baby and a little girl who will never walk, never talk, never feed herself, never have a boyfriend, never get married…

In this case handled by Elmira medical malpractice attorney Jim Reed, the Labor and Delivery nurses hooked the Mom up to an electronic fetal monitor and then left the Mom unattended for 40+ minutes. Unfortunately, fetal monitors are absolutely no good if no one is there to read the results….

That’s why the standard of care for labor and delivery nurses requires nurses to review the monitor strips for the first 20 minutes that the mother is placed on the monitor. If all is OK after 20 minutes, the Mom can then be left unattended for short periods of time. If the strips are not OK, then the nurse is trained to immediately intervene and summon a doctor if necessary.

In this case, a careful review of the medical records revealed that the mother had been left totally unattended for the first 40+ minutes she was placed on the fetal monitor. As you might have guessed, the monitor strips were bad meaning that the baby was in trouble and needed immediate delivery. The problem is that no one was in the room to hear read the results and respond to the baby’s cries for help. As a result, the necessary C-section to rescue the baby was delayed by more than an hour causing the baby to suffer profound brain damage (Cerebral Palsy). The baby was rushed from the Corning Hospital to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Arnot Ogden Medical Center in Elmira, but the damage was already done. The baby had a permanent brain injury called Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) which means that the baby’s brain was deprived of oxygen at birth. Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

N.Y. Workers’ Comp. and Labor Market Attachment

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers CompensationNo Comments

Under New York Workers’ Comp. Law, a totally disabled claimant has no obligation to seek employment. However, a partially disabled claimant generally has an obligation to make a reasonable search for work of any kind within his or her work capacity.

The insurance carrier may request that you produce evidence of your job search. If you cannot produce sufficient evidence of a diligent job search, the insurance company may be allowed to suspend your weekly payments.

There was a time when insurance companies didn’t push the labor market attachment issue; however, that time is over. These days insurance companies routinely ask claimants to submit detailed accounts of their job searches. If the claimant is unable to produce satisfactory documentation, Workers’ Comp. Law Judges routinely suspend benefits.

We advise our clients who have gone from totally to partially disabled to ask their employer if they have light duty within their restrictions. If the employer doesn’t have light duty, we advise our client’s to file for unemployment benefits and to make ongoing efforts to find work within their medical restrictions and to document that effort. See N.Y. Workers’ Comp. And Unemployment Benefits.

Additionally, we encourage our clients to work with the rehabilitation staff of the Workers’ Comp. Board. Among other services, the rehabilitation staff assists claimants with retraining and job search.

The good news is that partially disabled claimants are eligible for reduced earnings when as a consequence of the work related injury they take employment for less money than their average weekly wage prior to the injury. Reduced earnings are tax-free and are 2/3 of the difference between pre-injury and post-injury earnings up to the maximum allowable benefit, which means in some circumstances folks will actually receive a greater benefit by returning to work at reduced earnings.

Thanks for reading,
Eric

____________________________________________
Eric L. Johnson
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William St.
Elmira, NY 14902
Tel: (607) 733-8866
Fax: (607) 732-6062
Toll Free: 1-800-943-3529
Email: ejohnson@zifflaw.com
Web: http://www.zifflaw.com

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

District of Columbia, et. al. v. Heller: One for the Ages

Attorney Ethics, Choosing a Lawyer, Lawsuits, Miscellaneous, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and Cases3 Comments

Calling all Constitutional Law Junkies: June 26, 2008 was a monumental day.

It is not often (yet more frequent these days than is perhaps appropriate) that the U.S. Supreme Court authors a decision in which it offers — in nearly 150 pages of disparate, arguably subjective detail — overtly telepathic insight into the minds and hearts of the framers cast under a thin, unimpressive veil of stare decisis. A day to celebrate? Perhaps, as it was for the N.R.A. supporters and the libertarian crowd who view the District of Columbia, et. al. v. Heller through a narrow pragmatic lense as a promotion of individual liberties (and security that they can keep their guns.) A day for outrage? Apparently for a “frightened” Mayor Daley, as he trumpeted the call to fight for the right to ban guns in his hometown and plans were made to challenge similar laws in megapolises across the country.

I felt something in between. I feel scholastic excitement, to be sure. Heller , like Bush v. Gore, will certainly endure as a landmark case in Constitutional Law 101 for centuries to come. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia and joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy, is bursting with interesting (if somewhat trivial given Scalia’s general predisposition against extra-four corners constitutional analysis) historical references — James Madison’s inclusion of a conscientious-objector clause in his original draft of the Second Amendment; E. de Vattel’s 1792 “The Law of Nations, or, Principals of the Law of Nature”; England’s 1671 “Game Act”; and, of course, the mighty and ever-persuasive Federalist Papers. (As a reverent admirer of the Papers, Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

In NY, Bicycles Have The Same Rights to the Road as Cars

Auto Accidents, Keeping Your Family Safe, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments
Cycling

With soaring gas prices, more and more people are riding bikes to commute to work, to run errands, and for recreation. As a long-time, fanatical cyclist, it pleases me to see more folks enjoying cycling but I am concerned about what seems to be an increase in hostility toward bicyclists from the motoring public. If you are a bicycle rider, you know what I mean– the truck that lays on the horn as it crowds you to the curb, the car that passes you unsafely and unnecessarily close, and the car that pulls up to your rear wheel as you wait for a light to change. All of these things are dangerous and ILLEGAL. As discussed below, under New York law, bicyclists have the same rights (and obligations) to use the road as cars and trucks.

Before getting into the N.Y. laws applicable to bicycles and motorists, I wanted to make a more simple and basic suggestion: Let’s all share the road– if you are a cyclist that means ride safely and clearly signal your intentions to other traffic. If you are a driver, be patient and give bikes the space and time they need to ride safely. A simple idea but one that will promote greater safety for cyclists and minimize legal liability.

OK, let’s discuss the N.Y. laws applicable to bikes because I am sure many motorists would be surprised to learn that for the most part, bikes have just as much right to use the normal lane of traffic as a car.

Below is a letter that a local attorney, Bill Lodico, also a bicyclist, wrote to a local newspaper writer regarding the laws pertaining to motorists and cyclists:

I sending this letter to ask you to be careful in any piece you write to avoid giving the impression that cyclists are required to stay far to the right in traffic or on roadways. The last thing the cycling public needs is a motoring public operating under the misconception that cyclists aren’t entitled to use the whole road, or that cyclists are restricted to the narrow band “as far to the right as possible.” I’ve seen more than one instance where motorists have used their truck or car to enforce this spurious rule. I expect you don’t want to be part of that.

I expect you also don’t want to be a part of encouraging cyclists to ride in a way that may may make them less visible to motorists, or that may make them more likely to be accident victims as motorists attempt to squeeze into a narrow space between a cyclist and oncoming traffic.

While, as a general rule, it makes sense for cyclists to stay to the right half of a traffic lane, so as to allow the most room for motorists to pass, there are numerous times when cyclists can and should move to the left, including the situation where the cyclist is blocking motor traffic from passing in dangerous situations.

This is from the NYSDOT “tips for motorists”

–Don’t assume cyclists should position themselves on the road as far to the right as possible. Smart cyclists plot a line straight down the roadway 3-4 feet from the curb or parked cars. This allows them space to avoid road hazards and to be more visible to motorists and pedestrians.

–Be aware that when a road is too narrow for cars and bikes to ride safely side by side, bicyclists should ride in or near the center of the lane to discourage motorists from trying to pass.

–Some roads have bike lanes. Cyclists are required to use these lanes, but may enter into your lane in order to execute a left turn.

NY Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 1234(a) contains the provision stating where a cyclist should ride in the roadway: “near the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway or upon a usable right- hand shoulder in such a manner as to prevent undue interference with the flow of traffic. . “

The statute then goes on to include broadly stated exceptions even to this carefully crafted and qualified rule. Section 1234(a) continues: “. . . except when preparing for a left turn or when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions that would make it unsafe to continue along near the right-hand curb or edge. Conditions to be taken into consideration include, but are not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards or traffic lanes too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side-by-side within the lane.”

So, for instance, by the statute, in the two way sections on Church or Water west of Lake Street, where parking is allowed, a cyclist can, and probably should, ride smack in the middle of the traffic lane. Opening car doors present the hazard that pushes him to the left, and there’s clearly not enough room for the usual SUV (or even the typical Buick or Chevy) and bicycle ” to travel safelyl side by side within the lane.”

The rules of the road set out by the statute and by NYSDOT’s “Tips for Motorists” is obviously very different from any flat, simple rule about bikes staying to the right, and I’m suggesting it’s best if we avoid giving flat simple rules about where cyclists belong on the road, except to state that they do, in fact, belong on the road.

Bill Lodico
_______________________________________________________________

I think Bill did a great job of explaining this issue and I thank him for doing so.

Thanks for reading,

Jim Reed
jreed@zifflaw.com

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

Thinking Of Hosting A Party For Your Graduate? Think Again!!!

Keeping Your Family Safe, Miscellaneous, Most Popular Posts, NY Auto Insurance, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments
After the party.

Image via Wikipedia

It’s the time of year when your nearly grown son or daughter is graduating from high school, and you know what that means: Graduation Parties! Remembering all the fun you had back in the day, and wanting to be a “cool” parent, you may be considering throwing a party for your son or daughter and their friends that includes alcohol. After all, you reason, as long as I take the keys and they all spend the night, what’s the harm? If I don’t do it, these kids will just be off drinking AND driving somewhere else anyway.

If you are even considering a scenario like the one I outlined above, think again! These sorts of parties have a tendency to get out of control, and the noise alone may be enough make your neighbors call the police. Kids who aren’t experienced drinking alcohol have a tendency to over-indulge, with obnoxious, messy, and sometimes life threatening results. How are you going to explain a midnight trip to the emergency room to get some kid’s stomach pumped to his mother or father the next day?

As if you needed more reasons, consider this: you could go to jail! Don’t believe me? Just ask John Gurtler, Jr. Don’t recognize that name? I bet you would recognize his voice! He is the Public Address Announcer at Buffalo Bills games. It seems that Mr. Gurtler was having thoughts along the lines of the scenario I outlined above for his son’s post-prom party. All his son’s friends, more than 80 in all, were invited back to the Gurtler residence for a night of merriment and booze. All was going great until the police arrived at their Orchard Park, NY home, observed scores of obviously under age-and over-dressed teens pouring beers from multiple kegs scattered about the yard, and decided to intervene. Mr. Gurtler, Mrs. Gurtler and their teenage son have all been arrested and charged with Unlawfully Dealing With A Child for providing alcohol to minors. They will face one count for each of the kids present (at least the ones the police could catch). Each count carries a potential penalty of up one year in jail AND a $1,000.00 fine.

This is a case where jail time could very easily be imposed, too. Because Mr. Gurtler is a prominent individual, and because we are on the verge of graduation season, the judge may very well want to send a message to the community that this type of behavior will not be tolerated and will face stiff punishment. It would be the judge’s hope that the publicity associated with this case and the penalty doled out would dissuade any one else from doing something similar. Legally, this is known as general deterrance.

Let Mr. Gurtler’s mistake be a lesson to all of us here in the Twin Tiers.

For those of you interested in all the gory details of what the police found upon their arrival, I have attached a link from The Buffalo News story covering the arrest below.

Thanks for reading,

Adam M. Gee, Esq.
New York and Pennsylvania Personal Injury and Malpractice Attorney
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William Street
Elmira, NY 14901
Phone: (607)733-8866
Fax: (607)732-6062
Email: agee@zifflaw.com
www.zifflaw.com

http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/southernsuburbs/story/366740.html

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

Your Workers’ Comp. “Independent Medical Exam”

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers CompensationNo Comments
A statue of Asclepius. The Glypotek, Copenhagen.

Image via Wikipedia

As a New York Workers’ Comp. claimant you will very likely be subjected to an Independent Medical Exam (IME). Don’t let the name fool you! There’s nothing independent about these exams. IMEs are paid for by the insurance company and the insurance company isn’t interested in an unbiased opinion.

The insurance company is interested in obtaining a medical opinion that states your condition is pre-existing, is less severe than your doctor says and/or that you are malingering. The doctor performing the IME will be listening to everything you say and watching everything you do.

The purpose of this post is to provide some general advice we give our clients prior to their IMEs. For more background on IMEs please read Attorney Jim Reed’s post “Why ‘Independent’ Medical Exams Are NOT Independent.”

To prepare our client’s for an IME, we generally invite them to watch a video and then go over the highlights. Below are some DOs and DON’Ts regarding IMEs. Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Lawyers Working to Protect YOUR Rights

Choosing a Lawyer, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments
Downtown Albany as seen from the Corning Tower.

Image via Wikipedia

Last week, Jim Reed and Christina Bruner Sonsire (yes, Christina got married this past weekend!) traveled to Albany to join almost 150 other members of the New York Trial Lawyer’s Association to meet with NY legislators to discuss important legislation. Discussed topics included:

  • Whether defense lawyers should have the right to privately meet with your treating Dr’s outside your presence or the presence of your attorney.
  • Whether the rules should be changed so that if you contest a no-fault denial via the no-fault arbitration process, the results of that arbitration can’t be used against you in your personal injury case.
  • Whether the antiquated NY Wrongful Death Law should be changed to follow the 42 other states that recognize recovery for grief.

Today, N.Y.C. attorney Eric Turkewitz, discussed the lawyers who traveled to Albany (he was there) and asked some great questions:

  • If you have an attorney handling a personal injury matter, is the name of your lawyer on the list? Or at least someone from his/her firm?
  • And if not, did s/he attend last year or the year before?
  • Is s/he actively working in some way to preserve the civil justice system?
  • And if they have never done anything in this regard, why not?

Well, I can’t answer for the MANY who “claim” to be dedicated personal injury attorneys who were NOT there but I am darned proud that two of our ZiffLaw attorneys were among the 138 truly dedicated champions of consumer rights who made the long, inconvenient but important trip to Albany. I didn’t see any other lawyers from Elmira, Corning or Ithaca which was pretty disappointing….

Thanks for reading,

Jim Reed

jreed@zifflaw.com 

Share on Facebook

Honesty

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers Compensation1 Comment
Abraham Lincoln, The 16th president of The United States.

Image via Wikipedia

I always ask clients to tell the truth. However, preparing clients to be truthful often makes me uncomfortable because it’s not uncommon for a client to react as though I were accusing him or her of being less than honest. Please know that I believe that most folks strive to be truthful.

There is a popular myth that lawyers and law firms exist to win at any cost including integrity. That philosophy doesn’t pan out as well in real life as it does on TV.

One of our injury attorneys, Adam Gee wrote a recent blog post The Importance of Telling Your Attorney the Truth about a case that went south after it was determined that his client was not telling the truth. It happens every now and then that a case will swirl down the toilet because the client didn’t tell the truth.

The average Judge has probably listened to testimony day in and day out for years. He or she will pick up on inconsistencies. A statement made on cross examination that would likely be brought out on direct examination, if it were truthful, will stick out like a sore thumb to opposing counsel.

The best possible outcome can only be achieved when our clients are completely truthful about the facts of their case. The truth is the way to go because: it’s the right thing to do; it works better; and, if nothing else, it’s sure easier to remember: )

Thanks for reading,
Eric

___________________________________
Eric L. Johnson
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel: (607) 733-8866
Fax: (607) 732-6062
Toll Free: 1-800-943-3529
Email: ejohnson@zifflaw.com
Web: http://www.zifflaw.com

Share on Facebook

Thinking About Working Under The Table? Think Again!

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers Compensation, Social SecurityNo Comments
IRS building on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C..Image via Wikipedia

Too often we have folks come in who have had work injuries and their income was unreported. While these folks are still eligible for medical benefits under the Workers’ Comp. Law, they are not eligible for wage payments because they have no reported income.

Unfortunately, if you don’t have wage payments and you can’t afford to take time off work, the medical benefit may be meaningless. Furthermore, you’re out of luck when it comes to a schedule loss of use or any payment under the Workers’ Comp. Law based on wage payments. It gets worse.

By filing a Workers’ Comp. claim you will likely alert the Internal Revenue Service and the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance to the fact that you have income for which you haven’t paid taxes. Absolutely nothing good can come of that!

Additionally, if your income is unreported, you’re giving up not only Workers’ Comp. benefits, but unemployment benefits and Social Security benefits as well. So, if you’re thinking about not reporting your income, please think again. Come back for my next post in which I will discuss honesty and Workers’ Comp. claims.

Thanks for reading,
Eric

___________________________________
Eric L. Johnson
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel: (607) 733-8866
Fax: (607) 732-6062
Toll Free: 1-800-943-3529
Email: ejohnson@zifflaw.com
Web: http://www.zifflaw.com

Share on Facebook

Injured At Work? Treat With Your Own Doctor!

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers CompensationNo Comments

Under New York Workers’ Compensation Law you have the right to select any authorized physician for the treatment of your work related injury.  Many companies, however, push their injured employees to treat with the company doctor.

Many company doctors have cozy relationships with employers, which makes it difficult for the injured employee to get good care.  Many injured employees find the care from company doctors to be impersonal, unsympathetic, and even downright substandard.  In some cases, the employers pressure company doctors, which interferes with the normal doctor patient relationship and may result in the injured employee being released to work prematurely.

So how can this be avoided?  You must maintain control of your medical treatment.  In other words, see the doctor of your choosing.  Please come back for my next blog post in which I discuss the problems created by working under the table.

Thanks for reading,
Eric
____________________________________________
Eric L. Johnson
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel: (607) 733-8866
Fax: (607) 732-6062
Toll Free: 1-800-943-3529
Email: ejohnson@zifflaw.com

Share on Facebook

« Previous Entries