Ziff Blog
Do you have questions about NY injury law? If so, you have come to the right place! Here we will address the common questions our clients have been asking for many years. Welcome aboard! If you have a question not answered here, feel free to post your question here and we will be happy to respond.



$20,000,000+ Settlement Against Corning Hospital!

Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Tragically, just 40 minutes can make the difference between a healthy baby and a little girl who will never walk, never talk, never feed herself, never have a boyfriend, never get married…

In this case handled by Elmira medical malpractice attorney Jim Reed, the Labor and Delivery nurses hooked the Mom up to an electronic fetal monitor and then left the Mom unattended for 40+ minutes. Unfortunately, fetal monitors are absolutely no good if no one is there to read the results….

That’s why the standard of care for labor and delivery nurses requires nurses to review the monitor strips for the first 20 minutes that the mother is placed on the monitor. If all is OK after 20 minutes, the Mom can then be left unattended for short periods of time. If the strips are not OK, then the nurse is trained to immediately intervene and summon a doctor if necessary.

In this case, a careful review of the medical records revealed that the mother had been left totally unattended for the first 40+ minutes she was placed on the fetal monitor. As you might have guessed, the monitor strips were bad meaning that the baby was in trouble and needed immediate delivery. The problem is that no one was in the room to hear read the results and respond to the baby’s cries for help. As a result, the necessary C-section to rescue the baby was delayed by more than an hour causing the baby to suffer profound brain damage (Cerebral Palsy). The baby was rushed from the Corning Hospital to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Arnot Ogden Medical Center in Elmira, but the damage was already done. The baby had a permanent brain injury called Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) which means that the baby’s brain was deprived of oxygen at birth. Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Safety Tip #1 — Check your Tires

Auto Accidents, Choosing a Lawyer, Humor, Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Auto Insurance, NY Courts, NY Workers Compensation, Practice TipsNo Comments

“A stitch in time saves nine.” I never really understood this proverb when I was growing up, though I certainly heard my father use it on more than one occasion as he cautioned me to take my time before embarking on a new endeavor.

As a personal injury attorney in the Elmira/Corning, New York area, I have now come to understand the true wisdom behind those words, especially when it comes to automobile maintenance. Accidents certainly do happen, but general awareness of basic automobile maintenance can go a long way toward preventing personal injuries and saving lives. Although I do not profess to be an expert mechanic in any way, I have decided to post basic auto tips periodically this summer to inform – or more likely, remind – readers of simple steps you can take to protect your families from injuries sustained in automobile accidents.To many people summer is synonymous with road trips and family vacation, and I hope my tips will help readers stay safe when hitting the roads.

Tip #1 – Check your Tires

Today is my parents’ 40th wedding anniversary. My father, ever the romantic, decided to take my mother to the Sherwood Inn in Skaneateles, New York for a little getaway. Alas, as my parents pulled out of Horseheads to begin their journey, they got a flat tire. Luckily neither was injured and my dad had the tools to change the tire, though they may have been “spared” (I couldn’t resist) a short delay if only my dad had followed his own advice and checked car before getting on the road.

Tires are crucial to vehicle’s handling, traction, and stability, and can cause an automobile to loose alignment if they are not in proper working order. In general, you should check each of tire periodically, or about once a month.

When checking your tires, first look for obvious defects and damage, and visit a professional if anything looks seriously amiss.

It is very wise to carry a tire gauge in your automobile at all times, and you should check the pressure in each of your tires every time you check them. Tire pressure changes due to a variety of factors, though they are most commonly affected by changes in weather or air temperature. A decrease in air temperature often causes a loss in tire pressure, while an increase in air temperature often causes a gain.

Each vehicle has its own recommended air pressure, and information about it can likely be found in your vehicle’s owners manual. Although a tire’s maximum pressure is listed on its in fine print, you should never use max pressure as a guide when filling your tires because over-inflation allows tires to puncture more easily and can create instability for your automobile.

As an avid bicycle rider, I realize the importance of checking the pressure of my bike’s tires before every ride I take to avoid an accident (and make the ride more enjoyable!) Although checking a vehicle’s tires before every trip may be a bit overly onerous, it is something all of us could do a bit more frequently in order to stay safe.

Thanks for reading,

Christina Bruner Sonsire

Share on Facebook

“Frivolous Lawsuit” Commercials Distort The Truth

Attorney Ethics, Lawsuits, Medical MalpracticeNo Comments
*Beschreibung: alter FernseherImage via Wikipedia

While getting the kids ready for school in the morning, I often have the TV on some news program to check the weather, school closings and local happenings before work.  What I have been seeing lately is disturbing.  Nearly every day, I see a commercial touting the need for tort reform to prevent law suit abuse and “frivolous lawsuits“.  It seems unlikely that in the 10 minutes I have the TV on that I am seeing the same commercial the only time it airs, meaning this commercial is on the air quite frequently.  This concerns me because the commercial is so misleading.

I have a confession to make.  Even though I have been an attorney for more than 10 years and have handled probably more than a thousand lawsuits over that time, I have never personally seen nor brought a frivolous lawsuit.  I don’t personally know any attorneys who have done so either.  That’s not to say they don’t exist, though.  Everyone has heard of the judge who sued his dry cleaner over the lost pants, and I have occasionally heard of an individual who is not represented by an attorney bringing harassing lawsuits against the same person or people over and over again.  What you never hear of, though, is an attorney who makes his or her living as a trial attorney bringing frivolous claims.  There is a pretty good reason for this, too.  As a trial attorney, I have grown accustomed to getting paid at some point in the litigation.  Whether it is a personal injury case taken on contingency (meaning I get a portion of the proceeds of the case) or a case taken on retainer (meaning I am paid on an hourly basis) I don’t handle cases where there is no chance of earning my fee.  By definition, a frivolous claim is one in which there is no viable cause of action which could earn a fee.

Yet another reason I don’t bring frivolous claims is that the ethics rules governing attorneys prohibit bringing frivolous claims.  I am not about to put my license to practice law at risk for a case in which there is no chance of earning a fee.  Every other attorney I know feels the same way, which is probably why the frivolous cases we hear about are brought by people representing themselves.

The commercial that prompted this blog makes it seem as if frivolous lawsuits are rampant.  My guess is that the people funding this commercial are the same ones who claim that all the medical malpractice lawsuits are frivolous.  They claim that the poor doctors are sued so often they settle cases just to get rid of them.  Yeah, right.  As someone who regularly sues insurance companies, I can personally assure you that they are not settling frivolous claims just to get rid of them.  Its difficult enough to get them to put realistic money on legitimate claims.

Here’s something else you haven’t heard about these so called frivolous lawsuits against doctors: unlike nearly every other type of insurance out there, the doctor’s medical malpractice insurer has to have the doctor’s permission to settle the case.  Your auto insurance carrier doesn’t need your permission to settle a claim against you, and neither does your home owner’s insurance company, but the doctor has to agree to any payment on a claim made against him, including the so-called frivolous claims.  Makes you think a little, doesn’t it?

The next time you see a commercial like this on TV, take a minute to think about the claims they are making and who has enough money at stake to pay the millions of dollars required for an advertising campaign of this magnitude.  Think about who has enough at stake to spend that much money attempting to brainwash the public into thinking that the judicial system is bursting at the seams with frivolous lawsuits.  Think who would want to have that commercial running through the minds of potential jurors as they climb into that jury box.  Do you think that the insurance companies have anything to do with it?

If you want to know why this type of false advertising gets us angry, imagine that you are the Plaintiff and its your future being decided by those jurors with that commercial running through their heads.

Are you angry now?

Thanks for reading,

Adam M. Gee, Esq.
New York and Pennsylvania Personal Injury and Malpractice Attorney
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William Street
Elmira, NY  14901
Phone: (607)733-8866
Fax: (607)732-6062
Email: agee@zifflaw.com
www.zifflaw.com

Share on Facebook

HIPAA – ANOTHER CASE OF POWERFUL RIGHTS AND WIMPY REMEDIES

Auto Accidents, Health Insurance, Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and Cases, Practice TipsNo Comments

 

 

In a world seemingly dominated by all-encompassing HIPAA protections (i.e. the dozens of forms you are asked to sign when treated in the hospital) and daunting HIPAA fears (i.e. your boss’s warning that you cannot repeat, recite nor should you even remember information you learn from HIPAA sensitive documents while on the job,) the question inevitably arises: What can I do if I feel my so-called “HIPAA rights” are violated?

 

Proper analysis of that inquiry requires a basic understanding of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.  (A complete copy of the HIPAA statute can be found at http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm.)   Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

A Brief Introduction from the Newbie

Auto Accidents, Choosing a Lawyer, Humor, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

ziffchristinabrunermarch08-011_bannercrop4.jpg

As the newest addition to Ziff Law’s personal injury and malpractice litigation team, I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself to the firm’s blogosphere community.  Without going into too many details about my so-called “pedigree” and educational background – information about which can be found on Ziff Law’s website at www.zifflaw.com or a recent Star Gazette article at http://www.stargazettenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/BUSINESS/803220302  I want to provide you, the interested personal injury blog connoisseur, with some interesting (though not directly relevant to my practice) facts about me.

I was born and raised in the Twin Tiers and come from a long line of folks – going all the way back to my Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

A New NY Case Destroys Accident Victims Privacy Rights

Medical Malpractice, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Even though a large percentage of my practice is devoted to NY and PA medical malpractice cases, I have tremendous respect for the medical profession.  In fact, three of my college roommates and one of my best friends now are doctors.  I know most doctors are intelligent, compassionate and dedicated to good patient care.  Of course, like every profession, there are bad apples in the medical field who give a bad name to all the good doctors out there. 

But whether good doctor or bad doctor, an almost universal truth in the medical profession is that doctors dislike lawyers.  I think the reasons for this are many– some legitimate and some not– but that will have to be a subject for another post.   This post is devoted to a recent NY case that I think is HORRIBLE LAW and that I KNOW is going to create further friction between doctors and lawyers.  There is no doubt in my mind that this case will result in great abuse by insurance companies and their defense lawyers….

Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

What Medical Malpractice Crisis?

Lawsuits, Medical MalpracticeNo Comments

The doctors’ lobbies and the Insurance companies forced to pay malpractice claims have been trying to for years to convince people that there is a medical malpractice crisis.  They have been trying to convince the public that doctors are fleeing states without malpractice caps.  We have been telling everyone that will listen that this is a bunch of bunk.  Now we have proof.

In a recent announcement at the Philadephia College of Physicians, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell has announced that the medical malpractice crisis is over.  In support of this announcement, he cited to the fact that Medical Malpractice insurance rates are going down, as the two largest insurers in Pennsylvania have filed for rate decreases, and one is paying a dividend back to doctors.  Governor Rendell also revealed that 57 newly licensed entities are now selling medical malpractice insurance in Pennsylvania.  This healthy competition will result in choice and cost savings for doctors.  Pennsylvania recently added a requirement that Plaintiff’s attorneys certify that they have had a doctor review the case and that there is a good faith basis to believe malpractice has occurred, which is essentially the same system New York has had for years.  In Pennsylvania, this common sense requirement has resulted in a 38% decrease in the number of malpractice claims filed.  Contrary to the myths perpetuated by insurance companies and doctors’ organizations, the number of doctors in Pennsylvania continues to rise.

On a similar note, Workers Compensation insurers in Pennsylvania are likely to decrease by some 10% in the coming year.

Governor Rendell’s announcement proves that the doctors’ lobbies and insurance companies have been doing nothing more than fear mongering.  I hate to say I told you so, but…

Thanks for reading,

Adam M. Gee, Esq.

Share on Facebook

Medical Malpractice Coverups Are Illegal, Unethical and Happening All the Time….

Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice2 Comments

Just read a great post by Eric Turkewitz, How Medical Malpractice Gets Covered Up, that discusses an anonymous blog post by an obstetrical nurse who is baring the truth about how malpractice is actively covered up and how medical providers are pressured to cover one another’s butts by not accurately charting what is REALLY going on in a patient’s care.  Here’s a clip from the post:

Ever wonder how malpractice gets covered up or why it doesn’t appear in the medical records? Well, an anonymous obstetrical nurse from Pennsylvania opened that little door for us today.

Writing at the blog At Your Cervix (perhaps one of the most creative medical blog names around), she writes how she was reprimanded for documenting in the medical chart the name of a covering doctor that had reviewed the external fetal monitor strip. You read that right: Folks were actually mad at her for being accurate with her notes and writing down in the chart who had reviewed important information regarding the patient.

When I first started handling medical malpractice cases, I was naive enough to believe that no one would ever intentionally alter medical records. Sad to say it occurs quite frequently.

A recent post from my friend, Jim Carroll, a medical malpractice attorney from Athens, PA, highlighted a recent case of altered records from Wilkes-Barre, PA:

A doctor accused of failing to tell a patient she had cancer is now being accused of altering medical records in the case to try to cover up his error. Court papers say Dr. Feroz A. Sheikh altered the records of Margaret Radginski after she filed suit against him late last year. The doctor is accused of altering his records to show that he told his patient that she had cancer a year before the date that he truly told her that she had cancer.

Bad, bad, bad. Why can’t people just play by the rules and not cheat?  Well, unfortunately, the answer is that the stakes are so high, both from an economic and career perspective, that medical providers feel the need to cheat to cover their butts at the expense of the truth and their own patients.  Sad but true…

Think this is an exaggeration?  How about a recent Harvard study that found that 46% of doctors were aware a serious medical error that they did NOT report that error to authorities.

Hmmmm, and people wonder why we talk about the Medical Conspiracy of Silence….

Thanks for reading,

Jim Reed
jreed@zifflaw.com

Share on Facebook

The Cold, Hard Facts about Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Medical MalpracticeNo Comments

Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

A Follow Up To “Why Most Victims of Medical Malpractice Never Collect A Dime”

Choosing a Lawyer, Lawsuits, Medical MalpracticeNo Comments

First off, I want to thank the readers who have responded to the previous post - that’s the whole point of writing a blog; giving help or advice or just providing a place to sound off on a hot topic.  Judging by the response here, as well as what I see in my own practice, this is a hot topic indeed.

To be perfectly honest, the deck is stacked against the victims of medical malpractice.  The public (the same people who end up on a jury) is under a constant assault of propoganda from the medical lobbies and insurance industry trying to convince them that medical malpractice is a myth, that trial lawyers get rich by bringing frivolous claims (see Jim Reed’s previous article regarding this topic) against innocent doctors, and that these same trial lawyers are causing doctors to abandon certain practice areas and states in droves leaving people without adequate medical care.  Needless to say, none of this true.   In fact, the opposite is closer to the truth.

Medical malpractice is easily the most complicated, most expensive, and most heavily defended type of trial work we do.  In almost every other type of case if you show the insurance company that you have a strong case, they will at least talk with you about a reasonable settlement at some point short of the court house steps.  This is not the case with medical malpractice cases, though.  These cases are defended to the death, and settlement discussions never occur until the case is trial ready, and ususally not until the jury has already been picked.  Medical malpractice cases are expensive, too.  We routinely spend $50,000.00 dollars or more on expert witnesses, pre-trial depositions and exhibits to be used in court, and have spent as much as $80,000.00 on a single case.  Part of the reason these cases are so difficult to settle is because malpractice insurance policies are written differently that just about every other type of insurance, in that the doctor’s permission is required for the insurance company to settle the case.  Since a malpractice award has the potential to affect a doctor’s medical license, the doctors routinely refuse to permit a settlement until the last minute. 

Knowing that we are going to have such a significant investment in the case, we have to be careful about the cases we accept.  Handling medical malpractice cases is a good way to lose your shirt if you don’t know what you are doing.  The very unfortunate result is that we are sometimes forced to decline cases even where we believe malpractice has occurred simply because there are insufficient damages to justify bringing the case.  This is exactly the way the insurance industry and doctors lobbies like it.  In fact, they are constantly trying to make it even harder to bring malpractice cases, most recently by pushing states to enact “tort reform ” bills, usually in the form of caps on damages.

In case you can’t tell from this long post, the actions of the insurance industry and medical lobbies has us fuming.   You should be, too!

 Thanks for reading,

Adam M. Gee, Esq.

Share on Facebook

« Previous Entries