Ziff Blog
Do you have questions about NY injury law? If so, you have come to the right place! Here we will address the common questions our clients have been asking for many years. Welcome aboard! If you have a question not answered here, feel free to post your question here and we will be happy to respond.



$20,000,000+ Settlement Against Corning Hospital!

Lawsuits, Medical Malpractice, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments

Tragically, just 40 minutes can make the difference between a healthy baby and a little girl who will never walk, never talk, never feed herself, never have a boyfriend, never get married…

In this case handled by Elmira medical malpractice attorney Jim Reed, the Labor and Delivery nurses hooked the Mom up to an electronic fetal monitor and then left the Mom unattended for 40+ minutes. Unfortunately, fetal monitors are absolutely no good if no one is there to read the results….

That’s why the standard of care for labor and delivery nurses requires nurses to review the monitor strips for the first 20 minutes that the mother is placed on the monitor. If all is OK after 20 minutes, the Mom can then be left unattended for short periods of time. If the strips are not OK, then the nurse is trained to immediately intervene and summon a doctor if necessary.

In this case, a careful review of the medical records revealed that the mother had been left totally unattended for the first 40+ minutes she was placed on the fetal monitor. As you might have guessed, the monitor strips were bad meaning that the baby was in trouble and needed immediate delivery. The problem is that no one was in the room to hear read the results and respond to the baby’s cries for help. As a result, the necessary C-section to rescue the baby was delayed by more than an hour causing the baby to suffer profound brain damage (Cerebral Palsy). The baby was rushed from the Corning Hospital to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Arnot Ogden Medical Center in Elmira, but the damage was already done. The baby had a permanent brain injury called Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) which means that the baby’s brain was deprived of oxygen at birth. Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Legionnaires’ Disease Lawyer in NY & PA: Outbreak in Elmira, NY

NY Laws and CasesNo Comments
 
Image from a Radio-Tech News Blogpost about a new Remote Legionella Control Monitoring System

The attorneys at Ziff Law have been contacted by a number of people in the Chemung County, New York area who have contracted Legionnaires’ disease throughout the past several weeks.  Yesterday, Chemung County’s Health Department confirmed preliminary results of New York State lab tests show the presence of legionella bacteria in the hot water system at the Edward Flannery Apartments in Elmira, New York.  In response to the outbreak, the Health Department issued the following public health advisory yesterday:
 
“Public Health Advisory Issued to Flannery Tower Residents” 

Therefore, as a precaution, a Public Health Advisory has been issued to the residents of Flannery Towers that the use of hot water has been suspended until further notice.  As of tonight the management of the Towers has implemented a procedure to flush the water tank and then to super heat the system in an effort to kill the bacterial contamination.

Bottled water will continue to be provided to all residents for drinking and personal hygiene use.

The Elmira Housing Authority is working closely with the County Health Department in an effort to resolve this issue.

Sadly, the outbreak has already led to one death. 

Anna Marie Tongate

Anna Marie Tongate

Anna Marie Tongate, a resident of Flannery Towers in Elmira, New York, died of complications from Legionnaires’ disease on Thursday, August 14, 2008. Tongate, 75, was a life-long resident of Chemung County and is the mother of three children, eight grandchildren and three great-grandchildren.

Anna Tongate moved to Flannery Towers from Big Flats, New York last March because she had been living alone and wanted Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

The National Institute for Trial Advocacy — a Worthwhile Investment

Humor, Law Technology, Lawsuits, Most Popular Posts, NY Laws and Cases, Practice TipsNo Comments

 

Shortly after I joined Ziff Law, Jim Reed, the firm’s managing partner (and frequent poster on this blog,) told me to sign myself up for the two-week National Session on Building Trial Skills offered by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA).  “And by the way,” he remarked, “the program is located just outside Boulder, Colorado.”

‘Nuff said.  As a former resident of Denver and Missoula, Montana, I am a true lover of the mountains and was ecstatic about the chance to spend some time savoring mountain life.  Oh, NITA looked pretty cool as well.

I had no idea at the time that I was about to embark upon a career changing — if not life changing — voyage.  Seriously.  Two weeks at NITA equaled, for me and I suspect most of my classmates, at least five years of real world trial experience.  Unfortunately, as most practitioners recognize, cases are not tried nearly as often today as they were fifty years ago.  Increased pressures to settle matters quickly or engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution — such as mediation or arbitration — has created a professional atmosphere in which young attorneys wait years or even decades before ever getting a chance to see a case through to verdict.  (The one notable exception is in the area of criminal law, where cases are tried on a somewhat more frequent basis.)  (Watch an interview with The Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, one if NITA’s founders.)   

I was fortunate to have tried a number of cases as a prosecutor before participating in NITA’s National Session.  However, the skills and confidence I gained from NITA are unparalleled.  I had an opportunity to test myself against some of the best up-and-coming attorneys in the country — and even the world!  The faculty was comprised of seasoned practioners with practical, focused advice on how to become the very best trial lawyer possible, and the lecturers offered insight into cutting edge legal trends and technology emerging from all ends of the globe.  (Read NITA’s Blog.)   Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

Best Lawyers in Upstate NY — Triathlon Bragging Rights

NY Laws and Cases1 Comment

For some strange reason, ESPN failed to provide prime time coverage of an epic sporting event….

There's the finish line we were looking for!

Yesterday was the legal triathlon showdown between two Upstate NY law firms — the Ziff Law Firm from Elmira, NY versus their nemisis from the North, the Schlather, Geldenhuys, Stumbar & Salk firm from Ithaca, NY.

The Ziff Law team was made up of swimmer Adam “Speedo Boy” Gee, cyclist Jim “One Speed” Reed, and runner Christina “Crush ‘Em” Sonsire.

The Ithaca team was paced by ace swimmer Mariette Geldenhuys, runner Ray Schlather and cyclist Rich Stumbar.

The action took place at the Cayuga Lake Triathlon, Ithaca, NY which was the National Sprint Triathlon Championships!  There were more than 700 half-naked, super-buff bodies (sadly, we are not counting our bodies among the “super-buff) competing in a tremendously well-run event (Hats off to the Race Director Jane Miller!).

Keep reading to learn who won the showdown!! Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

NY LAW: Mandatory Swimming Pool Alarms

Keeping Your Family Safe, NY Laws and Cases3 Comments

A boy in a children's swimming pool.Image via WikipediaIf you have installed or modified a swimming pool in NY since December, 2006, you should know that NY law REQUIRES you to install a swimming pool alarm. Although none of us likes to spend more money to buy safety devices, we just have to keep in mind that they save lives and we all know you can’t put a price on that….

Thanks for reading,
Jim Reed
NY Accident & Injury Lawyer
jreed@zifflaw.com

Below is a story that WETM-TV, Elmira, NY, did on this pool alarm law:

NYS Pool Alarm Law Permanent
Reported by: Naveen Dhaliwal

ELMIRA HEIGHTS - New York State lawmakers have finally made a two year old pool alarm rule permanent. If you put a pool in your backyard, you need to have an alarm on it.

State lawmakers passed an emergency ruling two years ago that required all commercial and personal swimming pools to have an alarm system. That ruling expired last month and state lawmakers have now permanently adopted it.

Officials say alarms are required on all pools built or modified after December 14th of 2006. Experts say the temporary blows up pools also need to have alarms.

“Two bolts go into the top rail of the pool, and then the alarm just sits inside. It takes a 9 volt battery. Then there’s a separate remote that plugs into an outlet in your house so can hear it from in the house or out,” says Tom Witzel of Hesselson’s.

The cost of the alarms can range between $200 up to thousands of dollars.

Code enforcement officials say if you get caught without an alarm, you will be given a warning. After that you can get fined up to $1000 a day until an alarm is placed.

Officials say the law was originally put in place because 26 infants and children under the age of 14 drowned in a pool in 2002.

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

N.Y. Workers’ Comp. And Third Party Lawsuits

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers CompensationNo Comments
A worker bolts beams during construction; the ...Image via Wikipedia

Workers’ Compensation benefits are in most instances the injured worker’s exclusive remedy against the employer or a co-worker.

However, if your injury was caused by the fault of a third party then you can sue the responsible party for the full measure of your damages including lost wages, reduction of earning capacity, pain and suffering, and medical and other related bills and expenses.

Third parties are frequently liable in construction and motor vehicle accidents or when a defective product caused the injury.

Because the Workers’ Comp. insurance company has a lien for any compensation benefits you have received, third party lawsuits should be considered only when you have a serious injury. If you are seriously injured on the job, consult an attorney for your Workers’ Comp. case and a potential third party lawsuit.

We would be happy to meet with you and discuss your case.

Thanks for reading,
Eric

____________________________________________
Eric L. Johnson
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William St.
Elmira, NY 14902
Tel: (607) 733-8866
Fax: (607) 732-6062
Toll Free: 1-800-943-3529
Email: ejohnson@zifflaw.com
Web: http://www.zifflaw.com

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

N.Y. Workers’ Comp. and Labor Market Attachment

NY Laws and Cases, NY Workers Compensation2 Comments

Under New York Workers’ Comp. Law, a totally disabled claimant has no obligation to seek employment. However, a partially disabled claimant has an obligation to make a reasonable search for work of any kind within his or her work capacity.

The insurance carrier may request that you produce evidence of your job search. If you cannot produce sufficient evidence of a diligent job search, the insurance company may be allowed to suspend your weekly payments.

There was a time when insurance companies didn’t push the labor market attachment issue; however, that time is over. These days insurance companies routinely ask claimants to submit detailed accounts of their job searches. If the claimant is unable to produce satisfactory documentation, Workers’ Comp. Law Judges routinely suspend benefits.

We advise our clients who have gone from totally to partially disabled to ask their employer if they have light duty within their restrictions. If the employer doesn’t have light duty, we advise our client’s to file for unemployment benefits and to make ongoing efforts to find work within their medical restrictions and to document that effort. See N.Y. Workers’ Comp. And Unemployment Benefits.

Additionally, we encourage our clients to work with the rehabilitation staff of the Workers’ Comp. Board. Among other services, the rehabilitation staff assists claimants with retraining and job search.

The good news is that partially disabled claimants are eligible for reduced earnings when as a consequence of the work related injury they take employment for less money than their average weekly wage prior to the injury. Reduced earnings are tax-free and are 2/3 of the difference between pre-injury and post-injury earnings up to the maximum allowable benefit, which means in some circumstances folks will actually receive a greater benefit by returning to work at reduced earnings.

Thanks for reading,
Eric

____________________________________________
Eric L. Johnson
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William St.
Elmira, NY 14902
Tel: (607) 733-8866
Fax: (607) 732-6062
Toll Free: 1-800-943-3529
Email: ejohnson@zifflaw.com
Web: http://www.zifflaw.com

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

District of Columbia, et. al. v. Heller: One for the Ages

Attorney Ethics, Choosing a Lawyer, Lawsuits, Miscellaneous, Most Popular Posts, NY Courts, NY Laws and Cases3 Comments

Calling all Constitutional Law Junkies: June 26, 2008 was a monumental day.

It is not often (yet more frequent these days than is perhaps appropriate) that the U.S. Supreme Court authors a decision in which it offers — in nearly 150 pages of disparate, arguably subjective detail — overtly telepathic insight into the minds and hearts of the framers cast under a thin, unimpressive veil of stare decisis. A day to celebrate? Perhaps, as it was for the N.R.A. supporters and the libertarian crowd who view the District of Columbia, et. al. v. Heller through a narrow pragmatic lense as a promotion of individual liberties (and security that they can keep their guns.) A day for outrage? Apparently for a “frightened” Mayor Daley, as he trumpeted the call to fight for the right to ban guns in his hometown and plans were made to challenge similar laws in megapolises across the country.

I felt something in between. I feel scholastic excitement, to be sure. Heller , like Bush v. Gore, will certainly endure as a landmark case in Constitutional Law 101 for centuries to come. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia and joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy, is bursting with interesting (if somewhat trivial given Scalia’s general predisposition against extra-four corners constitutional analysis) historical references — James Madison’s inclusion of a conscientious-objector clause in his original draft of the Second Amendment; E. de Vattel’s 1792 “The Law of Nations, or, Principals of the Law of Nature”; England’s 1671 “Game Act”; and, of course, the mighty and ever-persuasive Federalist Papers. (As a reverent admirer of the Papers, Read the rest…

Share on Facebook

In NY, Bicycles Have The Same Rights to the Road as Cars

Auto Accidents, Keeping Your Family Safe, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments
Cycling

With soaring gas prices, more and more people are riding bikes to commute to work, to run errands, and for recreation. As a long-time, fanatical cyclist, it pleases me to see more folks enjoying cycling but I am concerned about what seems to be an increase in hostility toward bicyclists from the motoring public. If you are a bicycle rider, you know what I mean– the truck that lays on the horn as it crowds you to the curb, the car that passes you unsafely and unnecessarily close, and the car that pulls up to your rear wheel as you wait for a light to change. All of these things are dangerous and ILLEGAL. As discussed below, under New York law, bicyclists have the same rights (and obligations) to use the road as cars and trucks.

Before getting into the N.Y. laws applicable to bicycles and motorists, I wanted to make a more simple and basic suggestion: Let’s all share the road– if you are a cyclist that means ride safely and clearly signal your intentions to other traffic. If you are a driver, be patient and give bikes the space and time they need to ride safely. A simple idea but one that will promote greater safety for cyclists and minimize legal liability.

OK, let’s discuss the N.Y. laws applicable to bikes because I am sure many motorists would be surprised to learn that for the most part, bikes have just as much right to use the normal lane of traffic as a car.

Below is a letter that a local attorney, Bill Lodico, also a bicyclist, wrote to a local newspaper writer regarding the laws pertaining to motorists and cyclists:

I sending this letter to ask you to be careful in any piece you write to avoid giving the impression that cyclists are required to stay far to the right in traffic or on roadways. The last thing the cycling public needs is a motoring public operating under the misconception that cyclists aren’t entitled to use the whole road, or that cyclists are restricted to the narrow band “as far to the right as possible.” I’ve seen more than one instance where motorists have used their truck or car to enforce this spurious rule. I expect you don’t want to be part of that.

I expect you also don’t want to be a part of encouraging cyclists to ride in a way that may may make them less visible to motorists, or that may make them more likely to be accident victims as motorists attempt to squeeze into a narrow space between a cyclist and oncoming traffic.

While, as a general rule, it makes sense for cyclists to stay to the right half of a traffic lane, so as to allow the most room for motorists to pass, there are numerous times when cyclists can and should move to the left, including the situation where the cyclist is blocking motor traffic from passing in dangerous situations.

This is from the NYSDOT “tips for motorists”

–Don’t assume cyclists should position themselves on the road as far to the right as possible. Smart cyclists plot a line straight down the roadway 3-4 feet from the curb or parked cars. This allows them space to avoid road hazards and to be more visible to motorists and pedestrians.

–Be aware that when a road is too narrow for cars and bikes to ride safely side by side, bicyclists should ride in or near the center of the lane to discourage motorists from trying to pass.

–Some roads have bike lanes. Cyclists are required to use these lanes, but may enter into your lane in order to execute a left turn.

NY Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 1234(a) contains the provision stating where a cyclist should ride in the roadway: “near the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway or upon a usable right- hand shoulder in such a manner as to prevent undue interference with the flow of traffic. . “

The statute then goes on to include broadly stated exceptions even to this carefully crafted and qualified rule. Section 1234(a) continues: “. . . except when preparing for a left turn or when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions that would make it unsafe to continue along near the right-hand curb or edge. Conditions to be taken into consideration include, but are not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards or traffic lanes too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side-by-side within the lane.”

So, for instance, by the statute, in the two way sections on Church or Water west of Lake Street, where parking is allowed, a cyclist can, and probably should, ride smack in the middle of the traffic lane. Opening car doors present the hazard that pushes him to the left, and there’s clearly not enough room for the usual SUV (or even the typical Buick or Chevy) and bicycle ” to travel safelyl side by side within the lane.”

The rules of the road set out by the statute and by NYSDOT’s “Tips for Motorists” is obviously very different from any flat, simple rule about bikes staying to the right, and I’m suggesting it’s best if we avoid giving flat simple rules about where cyclists belong on the road, except to state that they do, in fact, belong on the road.

Bill Lodico
_______________________________________________________________

I think Bill did a great job of explaining this issue and I thank him for doing so.

Thanks for reading,

Jim Reed
jreed@zifflaw.com

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

Thinking Of Hosting A Party For Your Graduate? Think Again!!!

Keeping Your Family Safe, Miscellaneous, Most Popular Posts, NY Auto Insurance, NY Laws and CasesNo Comments
After the party.

Image via Wikipedia

It’s the time of year when your nearly grown son or daughter is graduating from high school, and you know what that means: Graduation Parties! Remembering all the fun you had back in the day, and wanting to be a “cool” parent, you may be considering throwing a party for your son or daughter and their friends that includes alcohol. After all, you reason, as long as I take the keys and they all spend the night, what’s the harm? If I don’t do it, these kids will just be off drinking AND driving somewhere else anyway.

If you are even considering a scenario like the one I outlined above, think again! These sorts of parties have a tendency to get out of control, and the noise alone may be enough make your neighbors call the police. Kids who aren’t experienced drinking alcohol have a tendency to over-indulge, with obnoxious, messy, and sometimes life threatening results. How are you going to explain a midnight trip to the emergency room to get some kid’s stomach pumped to his mother or father the next day?

As if you needed more reasons, consider this: you could go to jail! Don’t believe me? Just ask John Gurtler, Jr. Don’t recognize that name? I bet you would recognize his voice! He is the Public Address Announcer at Buffalo Bills games. It seems that Mr. Gurtler was having thoughts along the lines of the scenario I outlined above for his son’s post-prom party. All his son’s friends, more than 80 in all, were invited back to the Gurtler residence for a night of merriment and booze. All was going great until the police arrived at their Orchard Park, NY home, observed scores of obviously under age-and over-dressed teens pouring beers from multiple kegs scattered about the yard, and decided to intervene. Mr. Gurtler, Mrs. Gurtler and their teenage son have all been arrested and charged with Unlawfully Dealing With A Child for providing alcohol to minors. They will face one count for each of the kids present (at least the ones the police could catch). Each count carries a potential penalty of up one year in jail AND a $1,000.00 fine.

This is a case where jail time could very easily be imposed, too. Because Mr. Gurtler is a prominent individual, and because we are on the verge of graduation season, the judge may very well want to send a message to the community that this type of behavior will not be tolerated and will face stiff punishment. It would be the judge’s hope that the publicity associated with this case and the penalty doled out would dissuade any one else from doing something similar. Legally, this is known as general deterrance.

Let Mr. Gurtler’s mistake be a lesson to all of us here in the Twin Tiers.

For those of you interested in all the gory details of what the police found upon their arrival, I have attached a link from The Buffalo News story covering the arrest below.

Thanks for reading,

Adam M. Gee, Esq.
New York and Pennsylvania Personal Injury and Malpractice Attorney
Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, LLP
303 William Street
Elmira, NY 14901
Phone: (607)733-8866
Fax: (607)732-6062
Email: agee@zifflaw.com
www.zifflaw.com

http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/southernsuburbs/story/366740.html

Zemanta Pixie

Share on Facebook

« Previous Entries