Tragically, just 40 minutes can make the difference between a healthy baby and a little girl who will never walk, never talk, never feed herself, never have a boyfriend, never get married…

In this case handled by Elmira medical malpractice attorney Jim Reed, the Labor and Delivery nurses hooked the Mom up to an electronic fetal monitor and then left the Mom unattended for 40+ minutes. Unfortunately, fetal monitors are absolutely no good if no one is there to read the results….

That’s why the standard of care for labor and delivery nurses requires nurses to review the monitor strips for the first 20 minutes that the mother is placed on the monitor. If all is OK after 20 minutes, the Mom can then be left unattended for short periods of time. If the strips are not OK, then the nurse is trained to immediately intervene and summon a doctor if necessary.

In this case, a careful review of the medical records revealed that the mother had been left totally unattended for the first 40+ minutes she was placed on the fetal monitor. As you might have guessed, the monitor strips were bad meaning that the baby was in trouble and needed immediate delivery. The problem is that no one was in the room to hear read the results and respond to the baby’s cries for help. As a result, the necessary C-section to rescue the baby was delayed by more than an hour causing the baby to suffer profound brain damage (Cerebral Palsy). The baby was rushed from the Corning Hospital to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Arnot Ogden Medical Center in Elmira, but the damage was already done. The baby had a permanent brain injury called Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) which means that the baby’s brain was deprived of oxygen at birth. Read the rest…

I am in the process of drafting a complaint against a doctor, nurse and hospital for extremely egregious medical malpractice that led to the premature and unnecessary death of an Elmira man.  Included in my complaint is a claim for punitive damages.

In drafting the complaint I did a fair amount of research about punitive damages in New York, and learned several helpful tips for both practitioners and potential claimants.

At the onset, it is critical to understand what punitive damages are designed to do as well as the strict limitations New York Courts apply in their application.  New York’s tort system (the system that allows injured people to recover against the people or entities that caused their injuries through negligence, malpractice and intentional conduct,) generally allows an injured person to only be compensated for actual economic and non-economic injuries directly related to his or her injuries.  These types of damages are called “compensatory damages” because they are designed to compensate victims.  Compensatory damages include such things as lost wages, medical bills, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and future treatment costs.

Punitive damages, on the other hand, are designed to punish and deter the wrongdoer or “tortfeasor”.  In other words, the purpose of awarding punitive damages is to send a message to the torfeasor and all similarly situated persons or entities that the conduct alleged is so egregious and unacceptable as to require punishment in order to deter others from engaging in the same types of acts.

In 2008 the New York Law Journal published a very interesting article called “The Rules On Punitive Damages.”  In this article authors Steven Napalitano and Hayden Coleman explain, “[t]hese damages, also known as exemplary damages, serve a dual purpose: first, to punish the tortfeasor, and second, to deter both the wrongdoer and others similarly situated from engaging in the same conduct in the future.”

There is no question the bar for allowing an injured person to recover punitive damages in New York is set very high.  In a recent landmark case, New York’s Court of Appeals (the highest court in New York) observed:

“Punitive damages are permitted when the defendant’s wrongdoing is not simply intentional but evince[s] a high degree of moral turpitude and demonstrate[s] such wanton dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations”. (Ross v Louise Wise Serv., Inc., 8 NY3d 478, 489, quoting Walker v Sheldon, 10 NY2d 401, 405; see Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479; Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332, 335).

Indeed, Napalitano and Coleman assert “New York courts have strictly limited punitive awards to the most reprehensible instances of wrongdoing; they are only awarded in cases involving gross, wanton or willful fraud, or other morally culpable conduct.”

So, the question emerges: are punitive damages appropriate in my case?  Of course, the analysis required to answer this question must be performed on a case-by-case basis.  However, there are a few general considerations every practitioner and potential claimant should keep in mind:

1.   Does the conduct warrant punitive damages?

This is the million dollar (figuratively speaking, of course) question.  In many ways the answer starts in your gut.  Do the tortfeasor’s actions make you mad? Really mad?  Seething mad?  Do they make you want to call the newspaper and the cops and 20/20 because this sort of thing should never happen in the USA?  If the answer is a resounding yes, then perhaps you have a claim.

Much more critically, do the torfeasor’s actions make your 72 year-old/very fiscally conservative/wary of lawsuits/cheerleader of tort reform mother-in-law seething, red-faced mad?  Too often we see our cases through a rose-colored lens, and, after having sat with a grief-stricken family, believe punitive damages are a given.  They’re not.  Ever.  Vet your case out to your neighbors, your families, your colleagues.  Become part of some active list-serves.  Read verdict sheets.  There is simply no substitute for good old research.  It can save you a lot of time (and face) down the road when you are answering the summary judgment motion the defendant will surely bring.

2.   Would the conduct have made your mother-in-law seething, red-faced mad at the time it occurred?

Do not overlook this step!  Determine when the conduct occurred.  Is this a toxic tort case that involved conduct in the 1950’s?  Is this an asbestos case where the building was erected 50 years ago?

According to Napalitano and Coleman, “a claimant should be precise in defining the time period of the conduct allegedly justifying punitive damages. In cases where the conduct at issue happened many years ago, as is often the case in the toxic tort context, a plaintiff must be prepared to show that the conduct was outrageous based on the norms and knowledge then prevailing. Defense counsel may seek to engage an expert witness to establish that the conduct was not sufficiently malicious or vindictive at the time. Finally, if circumstances have changed so that the allegedly offending conduct could not happen today, as with a change in the law, defense counsel may properly assert that the goal of deterring future improper conduct cannot be satisfied.”

3.   Is the claim for punitive damages insured?

As usual, insurance is the 110 pound gorilla in the room.  It is one thing to be a crusader and secure a 10 million dollar punitive damages verdict for your client, but a whole other beast to actually translate the judgment into money your client can take to the bank.

Unfortunately, it appears claims for punitive damages are generally uninsurable in New York.  New York’s Court have ruled the public policy underlying a claim for punitive damages – that tortfeasors actually endure punishment in order to deter future bad conduct – is eradicated if insurance companies simply pick up the tab.

The law firm McCullough, Campbell & Lane, LLP created a detailed list of the rules governing the interplay of punitive damages and insurance in all 50 states, including New York:

Directly assessed punitive damages are not insurable in New York. See Public Service Mut. Ins. Co. v. Goldfarb, 425 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1981); Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Village of Hempstead, 397 N.E.2d 737 (N.Y. 1979); Soto v. State Farm Ins. Co., 600 N.Y.S.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993), aff’d 635 N.E.2d 1222 (N.Y. 1994); National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Ambassador Group, Inc., 556 N.Y.S.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990), appeal dismissed, 571 N.E.2d 85 (N.Y. 1991).

In addition, the court in Home Ins. Co. v. American Home Products Corp., 550 N.E.2d 930 (N.Y. 1990), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 902 F.2d 1111 (2d Cir. 1990), applied the prohibition to out-of-state punitive damages awards for which the insured seeks coverage in New York. The court pointed out that “the punitive nature of the award, coupled with the fact that a New York insured seeks to enforce it in New York against a New York insurer … calls for the application of New York public policy.” 550 N.E.2d at 933. See Zurich Ins. Co. v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 642 N.E.2d 1065 (N.Y. 1994) (noting that only when a statute allowing indemnification awards damages that serve a wholly punitive, and not compensatory, purpose are they precluded by New York policy).

Vicariously assessed punitive damages are not insurable in New York. See Zurich Ins. Co., 642 N.E.2d 1065.

This of course does not mean claims for punitive damages should never be asserted in NY, nor does it mean they are always uninsured.  It simply means practitioners should have their eyes wide open with respect to collections matters.

Thanks for reading!

Christina

_________________________________
Christina Bruner Sonsire, Esq.
NY & PA Injury & Malpractice Lawyer
Ziff Law Firm, LLP
303 William Street
Elmira, New York 14902-1338
csonsire@zifflaw.com
Office: 607.733.8866
Toll-Free: 800.ZIFFLAW (943.3529)
Web: zifflaw.com
Blog: NYInjuryLawBlog.com

I started my legal career at the Chemung County District Attorney’s Office where I prosecuted crimes against women and children, (and just happened meet my wonderful hubby).

Today I received an inquiry from WETM’s Law Talk regarding youthful offender adjudication.  The inquiry read:

I am curious about my Youth Offender status.  I made a stupid mistake and got arrested..small misdemeanor charge, nothing serious…anyways I spent a couple of hours in jail and went to court the next morning.  Since it was my first offense I was put as a Youth Offender and they said it would not be put on my record or “replacing an actual conviction” if I stay out of trouble of course for certain period of time.  Now I called the courthouse and was told my record is “clean” and will remain clean until for that period of time until they throw it out when the time comes.  I also called the Sheriff’s office where I was arrested and they said my arrest record along with the court record is sealed and will be thrown out when I finish my unwatched probation.

I had a background check done on me and nothing shows up…and I was also told that even though I was fingerprinted they will not send my fingerprints to the FBI because again my record is still considered clean.  I understand I can still have this put on my record if I mess up.

I just want verify if this is the case..I don’t want it sent up to the FBI and I want to know what’s your say on this.  Is this basically a 2nd chance for me not to mess up?  How certain is it that they will throw it out if I complete my probation?  Is there a certain law that applies with Youth Offenders?

This gave me a good chance to wade through the cobwebs in my noggin and think about Criminal Law for a few minutes.  I responded:

You are correct.  Unless you have something unrelated to this on your record, your record is clean.

New York State Law essentially allows young people under 18 who are charged with a misdemeanor a free pass the first time they get into trouble.  In other words, the misdemeanor conviction for a person age 18 or younger is replaced with “Youthful Offender Status” and the person’s record remains clear.

The law makes the replacement of a misdemeanor conviction with YO mandatory (called “mandatory YO”) for all people under 18 if that person has not been convicted (i.e. has not received YO in the past), though it may not apply to some misdemeanor sex crimes.   I am not sure.  A judge generally has discretion to grant YO (called “discretionary YO”) to any person under 18 regardless of the person’s past criminal history, though most judges do so very rarely.

My guess is you plead guilty to the misdemeanor and were granted mandatory YO and a conditional discharge or probation, meaning if you stay out of trouble for one year from the time you plead guilty the court will lose jurisdiction to resentence you.  If you get into trouble, the judge can bring you back into court and impose a greater sentence (jail, probation, etc), but, with respect to this charge, you should always be mandatory YO.

The bottom line is if what you say is true, your record is squeaky clean and you should not have any problems.  Keep in mind most background checks ask if you have ever been “convicted” of a crime.  The answer for you is no – YO is NOT a conviction.  But, be careful of the wording in the background check.  It may ask if you have ever been “arrested”, in which case you would have to say yes. Read the rest…

The Elmira Star Gazette reported that Steuben County officials identified the driver in a one car crash that occurred at about 5:00 A.M. on Wednesday, June 30, 2010, in Hornellsville.

Sheriff identifies driver in accident that injured 9

The Steuben County Sheriff’s Office named the driver in the one-car accident that injured nine teens Wednesday morning.

Six of the teens remain hospitalized today, deputies said.

The investigation is ongoing, the sheriff’s office said.

As I reported in an post earlier today, this terrible tragedy highlights a number of issues all parents need to consider.  Aside from the obvious concerns about underage drinking and teen drivers, an accident such as this with multiple victims raises several important questions regarding auto imsurance coverage.

Please take the time to read my earlier post, and do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions about your own coverage.  Many times coverage questions are asked after an accident occurs, and generally that is just too late.

Thanks for reading,

Christina

_________________________________
Christina Bruner Sonsire, Esq.
New York and Pennsylvania Lawyer
Ziff Law Firm, LLP
303 William Street
Elmira, New York 14902-1338
csonsire@zifflaw.com
Office: 607.733.8866
Toll-Free: 800.ZIFFLAW (943.3529)
Web: zifflaw.com
Blog: NYInjuryLawBlog.com

A horrific accident involving nine teenagers occurred at approximately 5:00 A.M. on Wednesday, June 30, 2010, in Steuben County, New York (near Corning).  Aside from highlighting the dangers associated with underage drinking and teen drivers, the accident raises several critical insurance coverage issues that every parent should understand.

According to the Elmira Star Gazette (full article pasted below, nine teens were injured in a one car accident in the Town of Hornellsville following an underage drinking party.

The parents of the nine injured teens are facing — or surely will face — tough questions with respect to how or if their children will be compensated as the teens begin the long road to recovery.

In general, parents of children injured in one-car motor vehicle accidents involving multiple passenger need to be aware of the following insurance coverage information:

1.  BASIC NO-FAULT COVERAGE – New York State Insurance Law requires every driver to provide at least $50,000 of Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) to each passenger of his vehicle regardless of whether he caused the accident or not.  This type of insurance is generally referred to as “No Fault Insurance” because it is triggered even if the driver was not at fault.

What does this mean?  Every passenger in a vehicle is entitled to $50,000 of PIP coverage under the driver’s insurance policy in the event the passenger is injured in an accident.  In general, PIP covers economic losses such as lost wages and medical bills.

Why is this important?  Here, assuming the driver had proper insurance coverage, all nine teens (the driver is entitled to PIP benefits as well) are likely entitled to receive up to $50,000 to compensate them for their economic loss.  In addition, a passenger may be able to collect No Fault PIP benefits under his own policy once PIP iunder teh driver’s policy is exhausted.  This is called “stacking” PIP coverage, and it often allows a passenger to receive up to $100,000 to cover economic loss.

2.  ADDITIONAL NO-FAULT COVERAGE — Residents of New York are also free to purchase additional No Fault coverage in the event they or members of their families are seriously injured in an accident and their economic losses exceed $50,000.  The two primary types of additional coverage are called Additional Personal Injury Protection (“APIP”) and Optional Basic Economic Loss Coverage (“OBEL”).

What does this mean?  If you or a family member are seriously injured in an accident and your economic loss — again, I am primarily talking about lost wages and medical benefits — exceed the available PIP coverage ($50,000), APIP and OBEL can be triggered to cover your excess expenses.  In addition, as a passenger you may be able to collect against the driver’s APIP and/or OBEL coverage, depending on how the policy is written.

Why is this important? According to the Star Gazette article, at least three of the teens suffered serious injuries and were helicoptered to Strong Memorial Hospital.  A helicopter ride alone generally costs around $2,500, and it is safe to assume the medical bills for these teens could approach $50,000 very quickly.

The passengers first need to determine whether the driver had APIP or OBEL coverage.  If so, it is possible the passengers could be compensated for additional economic loss under the driver’s policy, depending on how it was written.

Next, if the teens’ parents have APIP or OBEL coverage, the teens will likely be considered “Resident Relatives” and will meet the standard to be named an “eligible injured person” under their parents’ polices.  (Important tip — MAKE SURE YOU HAVE APIP AND OBEL NO FAULT COVERAGE.  At Ziff we are willing to review your insurance policy FOR FREE. Just stop in or email us a copy of your policy to info@zifflaw.com.)

3.   LIABILITY COVERAGE– In addition to no-fault coverage, New York State Insurance Law requires all drivers to carry at least $25,000/$50,000  liability coverage.  What does this mean?  It means every driver on the road in New York is required to provide at least $25,000 of coverage to any one injured person for non-economic loss(things like pain and suffering, serious disfigurement and loss of enjoyment of life) because of his negligence.  If more than one person is injured, the total maximum recovery is limited to $50,000 regardless of whether two people are hurt or whether 20 people are hurt.  If there are more than two people hurt, those people would have to split the $50,000 “pie”.

Of course, drivers are permitted to carry — and, in my opinion, SHOULD carry –  much higher liability coverage.  Why is this important?  In an accident such as this — where I am Read the rest…

I was recently contacted by e-mail for some legal advice by a reader of the NY Injury Law Blog. This person had gone over some of my posts, particularly “The “People’s Court”– NY Small Claims Court.”

I am going keep this person’s identity confidential, but I want to share my response because I believe this advice will be useful to other readers.

The person who contacted me had been the victim of an assault. The assailant had pled guilty and awaits sentencing. The victim had a permanent scar from the assault and this damage was the source of the question to me.  As a NY personal injury attorney, could I advise:

1. How the assault victim should act and speak when before the judge.

2. What amount of compensation might be expected for a scar?

3. When would the compensation decision be made and is there a process to collect claims won in Small

Claims Court?

Here is the advice that I offered:

1. Go to court prepared and organized. Have an outline of how you are going to explain what happened to the judge. Take some good pictures of your scar and print them out as 8-inch by 10-inch images so you can give them to the judge.

Go to the Court Clerk’s office and get a copy of the Certificate of Conviction showing the guilty plea. If you have any witnesses to the assault, bring them with you and have them prepared to tell the judge how you were assaulted.

Stay calm and be polite to the judge (say “Yes, sir,” and “No, sir,” etc.).

2. Scars are tough to value and there is no single website where you can get a precise idea of value.

However, with that said, don’t sweat it because the decision about how much your scar is worth is up to the judge anyway. In order to convince the judge to give you the highest amount possible, you need to be prepared to tell the judge in a calm, honest way about the many different ways in which the scar bothers you both emotionally and physically.

Tell your story with as much heart as you can, but be honest and be careful to not come off as a total whiner.

3. In Small Claims Court, the judge makes the decision. Usually he or she makes it that day, but he or she can “reserve decision” to secure more time think about the ruling.

There is a process to collect, and you can read about it in the informational booklet available at Small Claims Court.

I hope this advice helps the reader who contacted me, as well as anyone else anticipating a day in Small Claims Court.

I enjoy working on the NY Personal Injury Law Blog and helping readers make sense of some very complicated and scary legal issues. Please feel free to contact me with questions – I’m happy to help and explain what you need to know.

Thanks for reading,

Jim
_________________________________________
James B. Reed, Esq.
Personal Injury & Malpractice Attorney
Ziff Law Firm, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel. (607) 733-8866 Fax. (607) 732-6062
Toll Free 1-800-943-3529
mailto:jreed@zifflaw.com http://www.zifflaw.com
E-mail me at FreeReports@zifflaw.com for two free books:
NY Car Accidents and NY Car Insurance Secrets YOU Need to Know.

In a previous post here on the NY Injury Law Blog, I explained the truth about “Independent” Medical Examination (IME) with the insurance company’s doctor. In the original post: “IME Doctors Change Diagnoses for Insurance Company Exams”, I explained how some doctors deliver the diagnoses that the insurance companies want – because the insurance companies pay fees to the doctors.

If you bring an injury lawsuit or file a no-fault claim in New York or Pennsylvania, the insurance carrier has a right to have you examined by a doctor of their own choosing. This is usually referred to as an “IME” which is an acronym for “Independent Medical Examination.” Don’t let this phrase fool you. There is absolutely nothing that is “independent” about this examination.

An IME is an examination paid for by the insurance company with the hope that they will be able to get ammunition from their doctor that will permit them to terminate or minimize their obligation to fully compensate you for your injuries.

Because these exams are NOT “independent,” I refer to an IME as an “INSURANCE Medical Exam.”

Let’s face it, the insurance company is sending you to THEIR doctor with the hope that they may show you are not as disabled as your doctor says. This is a Dr. who is paid a lot of money by the insurance company to tell them exactly what they want to hear: namely, that you are not injured.

Therefore, the “independent” medical doctor who you are going to see will try to show that you are exaggerating, malingering, magnifying your symptoms, or just pretending.

I wouldn’t represent you if I thought that you were guilty of any of these situations. Nevertheless, sometimes doctors make a “mountain out of a molehill” because they are conditioned to believe that most claimants are malingering, pretending, or exaggerating. Some doctors automatically find, and will testify that the results of their examination indicate that you are malingering, pretending, etc.

The defendant’s doctor is listening to EVERYTHING you say and watching everything you do. He will dictate a report of what he sees and hears immediately when you leave his office.

HERE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU SHOULD NOT DO OR SAY AT INSURANCE MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS:

• Don’t lie. Ever. A single lie can undermine your whole case.

• Don’t try to outsmart the doctor. You can’t do it.

• Don’t drive yourself to the visit. Try to have your spouse, friend or neighbor drive you.

• Don’t talk about your accident, injuries, insurance company or case in elevators, common areas or doctor’s waiting room.

• Don’t wear dangling jewelry or earrings.

• Don’t jump on and off of the examination table at the doctor’s office.

• Don’t come in tight jeans or cowboy boots.

• Men, don’t come unshaven.

• Ladies, don’t come with make-up on or wearing high heels.

• Don’t leave the doctor’s office in a running trot or quick walk and jump into your car, because the doctor is probably watching you from his or her window.

• Don’t use medical jargon or fancy terminology when discussing your case or describing your symptoms.

• If you are complaining of a neck injury, don’t twist your head back and forth when the doctor is moving about the room in an effort to follow his movements.

• Don’t discuss money or any plans of retirement with the doctor.

• Don’t discuss your marital situation with the doctor unless the exam is for a psychological injury. Your marital situation is not relevant to the present examination. This is a physical examination.

• Don’t exaggerate your problems. Be truthful, but conservative. On the other hand, don’t minimize your problems. Just tell it like it is.

• Don’t moan, groan and wince or grimace in pain every time the doctor touches you. No matter how lightly or heavily the doctor may touch you, be natural, be yourself, tough it out as best you can. However, if what he is doing hurts you, honestly tell him that he is hurting you.

• Don’t ask the doctor for medication or pain pills.

• Don’t talk about your labor union to the doctor.

• Don’t talk to the doctor about the insurance carrier, attorneys or the adjusters.

• If you have a bad back, don’t bend down and untie your shoes. Wear loafers and kick them off/slide them on.

• Don’t allow the insurance company’s representative to be in the examining room with you when the doctor examines you. Simply explain to the doctor that you deem physical examinations to be private and would like to have the representative leave the room. Be polite and sincere when you say this.

• Do not discuss with the doctor the amount of your claim or the amount of wages you used to make. Politely decline to do so by saying that the insurance company has that information.

• Do not discuss with the doctor whether you have any hearings coming up on your case.

• Do not discuss what you deserve for a settlement or your plans for spending the money you may get.

HERE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU SHOULD DO OR SAY AT THE INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS:

• Be honest and cooperative with the doctor.

• Be pleasant. At the same time, you should not behave in such a fashion that the doctor can say you were laughing during the examination.

• Be concerned. Be serious. Be polite. Give the doctor accurate, but brief, history on how your accident or injury occurred.

• Give the doctor an accurate history of your job details and what you do in terms of lifting, bending, stooping, carrying, and walking.

• If the doctor asks you about any previous injuries or illnesses you had before the present one, be honest and tell him the nature of any injuries you had, and whether you had surgery in connection with those previous injuries. On the other hand, do not volunteer information.

• If the doctor asks if you have had any previous workers’ compensation claims, you should say to him, “I’ve had previous workers injuries” (if that is true). However, you should always disclose any injury whether it is work related or not if the doctor asks you for a previous history of injuries.

• Be aware that the doctor is sometimes performing the same test on you in more than one fashion and in more than one way. For example, the doctor may test your legs when you are sitting up and when you are lying down. This is the same test. Therefore, if you complain of pain inconsistently, the doctor is going to make note of it. Don’t try in any way to magnify or exaggerate your pain. Let the truth come out and we will obtain a more favorable report from the doctor. If you exaggerate your pain, or if you are inconsistent, or if you try to impress the doctor with the significance of your pain, this will only give the doctor ammunition with which to hurt your case.

• If you are totally disabled, explain to the doctor that if there was any way you could be back at work, you would be there.

• If you have a long work history (a long history is 5 years or more) emphasize to the doctor that you have worked for this employer for a significant number of years and you would like to get back to work.

• If you have a short history of work with the employer and you enjoyed your job, explain to the doctor that although your employment with this employer was brief, you enjoyed working there and would like to return to work.

• When you are giving a history to the doctor as to how the accident occurred, please mention all injuries that you suffered as a result of this accident. For example, if you mainly injured your back when you fell, but you also hurt your knee, mention that you hurt your left or right knee (as the case may be). If, when you tried to stop your fall you pushed out your hands, mention that your primary pain is in your back, but you tried to break your fall with your hands and you also bruised them.

• Remember, the person who tells the doctor that he/she does absolutely nothing all day is less likely to be believed than a person who says, “I try to be active or I try to do some chores, but I suffer for it the next couple of days.”

• Finally, ask the doctor to send a copy of his or her evaluation to your treating doctor.

IMPORTANT: IME doctors will often exaggerate the time they spent questioning and examining you. To combat this, it is imperative that you keep track of the time you spent with the doctor. Do not be obvious about doing so but glance at your watch so you can accurately advise us of the times.

ALSO IMPORTANT: As soon as you are home, sit down and write down every detail you can recall of your exam (i.e. time spent with a nurse or doctor, questions asked by the doctor and your answers, tests performed by the doctor, etc.). We understand that you can’t remember everything but just do the best you can.

If you have any questions your IME, contact us. The Ziff Law Firm even has a videotape to help clients prepare for an IME. Please contact our office for a consultation, and check the post “IME Doctors Change Diagnoses for Insurance Company Exams” to be forewarned about this important part of your injury case.

Thanks for reading and let me know if you have any questions,
Jim
_________________________________________
James B. Reed, Esq.
Personal Injury & Malpractice Attorney
Ziff Law Firm, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel. (607) 733-8866  Fax. (607) 732-6062
Toll Free 1-800-943-3529
mailto:jreed@zifflaw.com http://www.zifflaw.com

E-mail me at FreeReports@zifflaw.com for two free books:
NY Car Accidents and NY Car Insurance Secrets YOU Need to Know.

My three teens are going to kill me, but I am strongly in favor of proposed new legislation by NY Senator Gillibrand. It would create a federal law to require all 50 states to implement a Graduated Drivers License program, phasing in unlimited drivers licenses.

Having handled countless NY and PA car crash cases involving teen drivers, I know first-hand the dangers of teen drivers.

Teens are incredibly smart and many handle extensive responsibilities. The fact remains, however, that they are involved in a disproportionately high number of accidents. Inexperience and distractions play a role in many of those accidents. I strongly favor any new legislation which restricts dangerous teen driving.

Sen. Gillibrand’s office compiled the Sen. Gillibrand STAND UP Act Report, with statistics on teen drivers in New York state, county by county.

According to the report, in the Rochester-Finger Lakes Region, there are more than 20,000 16 and 17-year-old drivers.
The Evening Tribune in Hornell printed the story “Senator wants national standard for teen drivers” which included these details about the bill:

“The STAND UP act would set minimum requirements for states, including:

• A three-stage licensing process, from learner’s permit to intermediate stage to full, non-restricted drivers license.
• Prohibited night driving during the learner’s permit and intermediate stage.
• Passenger restrictions during learner’s permit and intermediate stage; no more than one non-family member under 21 may travel with a learning teenage driver, unless a licensed driver over 21 is in the vehicle.
• Prohibited non-emergency use of cell phones, including texting, during the learner’s permit and intermediate stages.
• Learner’s permit to be issued at age 16 and non-restricted drivers license issued at age 18.
• Other requirements set by Secretary of Transportation, including learner’s permit holding period and intermediate stage holding period at least six months; at least 30 hours of driving supervised by a licensed driver 21 years old or older; and automatic delay of full licensure if permit-holder commits an offense like speeding, driving without a seatbelt or DWI.”

Also according the the Tribune’s story, Sen. Gillibrand hopes that New York sets an example for other states. I agree that these restrictions on teen driving are a good idea for the safety of our kids.

Thanks for reading,

Jim

_________________________________________
James B. Reed, Esq.
Personal Injury & Malpractice Attorney
Ziff Law Firm, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel. (607) 733-8866 Fax. (607) 732-6062
Toll Free 1-800-943-3529
mailto:jreed@zifflaw.com http://www.zifflaw.com
E-mail me at FreeReports@zifflaw.com for two free books:
NY Car Accidents and NY Car Insurance Secrets YOU Need to Know.

My colleague Matt Hughson, a bankruptcy and real estate attorney with the Ziff Law Firm, recently posted a guest posts on his blog, the NY Bankruptcy Law Blog, by Sergei Lemberg, a Stamford, Connecticut, attorney and consumer advocate.

I wanted to share Sergei’s post on the NY Injury Law Blog as well, because although it may seem to be off-topic, dealing with medical debt is a serious problem for many of injury victims. They may be facing huge hospital bills at the same time they are unable to work because of an accident.

Sergei is best known for helping his clients get fair and just treatment from debt collectors and for protecting the rights of his clients under the Lemon Law. Here’s Sergei’s take on debt collection and how you can get relief from hounding by collectors:

“Debt collection calls usually make people mad, frustrated, and sometimes even hopeless. Debt collection agencies are known for socking it to people when they’re down, and will use any number of tactics to take advantage of vulnerabilities in an attempt to get people to pay.

Most people don’t know that there is a very strict federal law that regulates what collectors can and cannot do when they’re attempting to collect a debt. It’s called the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. If a debt collection agency violates the FDCPA, it can be sued in federal court. You, as a consumer, can receive up to $1,000, any actual damages, and payment of your attorney fees.

But how do you know when a debt collector crosses the line?

Here are the TOP FIVE five transgressions that Debt Collectors TRY to GET AWAY WITH:

1. Embarrassing you. Embarrassment can take a number of forms, but the FDCPA is very clear that shaming you is against the law. For example, it’s illegal for a debt collector to send you a postcard in the mail, or an envelope with writing on the outside that indicates the letter is an attempt to collect a debt. Similarly, an agency can’t publish your name or tell others that you owe money.

2. Sending fake documentation. Debt collection agencies often send mailings that look as though they’re official court or government documents. This is against the law. This is a favorite tactic because unsuspecting consumers often respond to what they perceive as official mail.

3. Calling you at all hours of the day and night. The FDCPA says a debt collector can’t call you early in the morning, late at night, or at work – unless you’ve indicated that you’d like to be called at those times. In addition, debt collection agencies can’t repeatedly call and hang up, or call to the point of harassment.

4. Charging you more than you owe. Third party debt collectors will often try to get every penny they can, and will try to tack on a “collection fee” or extra interest charge. This is illegal.

5. Misusing postdated checks. In an attempt to make the harassment stop, consumers will often send a debt collection agency a series of postdated checks. All too often, the collector will deposit those checks early, leading the consumer into even more hot water as he or she racks up bank overdraft charges. The FDCPA prohibits this practice, and requires that debt collectors send you written notice of their intent to deposit your check.

Difficult to believe that people in business – even the business of collecting debts – try to get away with these tactics. Unfortunately, if you don’t know your legal rights, that’s just what they’ll do: Get away with it.

Check out Sergei’s Web site, StopCollector.com, for more information about your rights if you’re in debt.

Thanks for reading,

Jim
_________________________________________
James B. Reed, Esq.
Personal Injury & Malpractice Attorney
Ziff Law Firm, LLP
303 William St., Elmira, NY 14902
Tel. (607) 733-8866  Fax. (607) 732-6062
Toll Free 1-800-943-3529
mailto:jreed@zifflaw.com http://www.zifflaw.com

E-mail me at FreeReports@zifflaw.com for two free books:
NY Car Accidents and NY Car Insurance Secrets YOU Need to Know.

As a Plaintiff’s Attorney who conducts depositions on a regular basis, one of the more frustrating issues I encounter is the non-party witness (NPW) who is represented by counsel.  Sometimes the NPW brings in their own outside counsel to represent them.  More commonly, the NPW has some loose affiliation with the interests of the Defendants in the case, and defense counsel tries to claim that they are also representing the NPW.  Defense counsel then obstructs objects and delays, hoping to prevent me from obtaining damaging information from the NPW.  These kinds of tactics usually end up in the deposition being adjourned, or a call to the judge to determine the extent to which the defense attorney will be allowed to participate, with wildly varying decisions froom the judges who have addressed the issue.

Thankfully, the Appellate Division has finally ruled on the issue.  In Thompson v. Mather, the NYS Appellate Division, Fourth Department recently ruled that while an NPW is certainly entitled to whatever counsel they want, the NPW’s attorney IS NOT entitled to participate in the deposition.  So they can’t object or obstruct or delay or do any of the many other things that slow, and sometimes stop a deposition dead in its tracks.

This is a boon for not just plaintiffs attorneys, but for every attorney who handles depositions.  The trial judges who have to field phone calls from attorneys complaining of these tactics will be happy to hear of this decision as well.  Many thanks to our good friend Eric Turkewitz, who wrote about the topic here.  It seems that the scales of justice may be tipping toward common sense!

Thanks for reading,

_______________________________
Adam M. Gee, Esq.